四級(jí)寫作預(yù)測：學(xué)生給老師打分
1．學(xué)生給老師打分已很普遍
2．人們對(duì)其持不同態(tài)度
3．我的看法
【范文】
Nowadays, it has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade teachers as for teachers to grade students. In some universities students rating has even become the only source of information on teaching effectiveness.
This, however, has caused great controversy. Some are in favor of the rating system. They hold that since students attend the teachers classes everyday, they should have their opinion about their teachers effectiveness. Others, on the contrary, are strongly against it. They believe that there is much more to teaching than what is shown on students rating forms. Students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used are up to date or how well the teacher knows about the subject. These judgments require professional knowledge, which is best left for the teachers colleagues.
I think students rating of their teachers is necessary, but it should be conducted in a way that can really shed meaningful light on teachers performance. Instead of rating the teachers knowledge on the subject, students should be asked to estimate what they themselves have leaned in a course, and to report on such things as a teachers ability to communicate with students, his relationship with students, and his ability to arouse interest in the subject.
1．學(xué)生給老師打分已很普遍
2．人們對(duì)其持不同態(tài)度
3．我的看法
【范文】
Nowadays, it has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade teachers as for teachers to grade students. In some universities students rating has even become the only source of information on teaching effectiveness.
This, however, has caused great controversy. Some are in favor of the rating system. They hold that since students attend the teachers classes everyday, they should have their opinion about their teachers effectiveness. Others, on the contrary, are strongly against it. They believe that there is much more to teaching than what is shown on students rating forms. Students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used are up to date or how well the teacher knows about the subject. These judgments require professional knowledge, which is best left for the teachers colleagues.
I think students rating of their teachers is necessary, but it should be conducted in a way that can really shed meaningful light on teachers performance. Instead of rating the teachers knowledge on the subject, students should be asked to estimate what they themselves have leaned in a course, and to report on such things as a teachers ability to communicate with students, his relationship with students, and his ability to arouse interest in the subject.
