gre argument214提綱分析匯總
前段時間為gre考生匯總了gre issue寫作提綱思路和分析，希望對考生在攻破gre issue寫作上有所幫助。接下來的幾天我們將為gre考生整理gre argument部分的提綱內容。希望通過我們的整理和匯總，讓gre考生真正能掌握gre寫作的精髓。
題目題材：教育，城市，社會
gre argument 214題目：
In each city in the region of Treehaven, the majority of the money spent on government-run public school education comes from taxes that each city government collects. The regions cities differ, however, in the value they place on public education. For example, Parson City typically budgets twice as much money per year as Blue City does for its public schoolseven though both cities have about the same number of residents. It seems clear, therefore, that Parson City residents care more about public school education than do Blue City residents.
提綱：
The citys budget for its public schools is not an accurate indication of the value it places on public education.
The author fails to inform us what fraction of the total budget are used for public schools in each city, thus we cannot evaluate which city cares more about public school education.
Many other differences between Parson City and Blue City may also contribute to the differences in the amount of money they budget for their public schools.
We do not know the amount of students who go to public schools in the two cities, thus we could not evaluate the argument.
The amount of city budgets for public schools may not represent residents attitude towards public school education.
注：題目中括號里的數字表明這句話體現的是提綱中第幾號缺陷。
無論是gre issue還是gre argument，考生都應該養成寫提綱的習慣。這種提綱式的gre寫作練習可以幫助考生鍛煉寫作的邏輯性，而gre寫作高分最重要的得分依據就是作文的邏輯性要強。
前段時間為gre考生匯總了gre issue寫作提綱思路和分析，希望對考生在攻破gre issue寫作上有所幫助。接下來的幾天我們將為gre考生整理gre argument部分的提綱內容。希望通過我們的整理和匯總，讓gre考生真正能掌握gre寫作的精髓。
題目題材：教育，城市，社會
gre argument 214題目：
In each city in the region of Treehaven, the majority of the money spent on government-run public school education comes from taxes that each city government collects. The regions cities differ, however, in the value they place on public education. For example, Parson City typically budgets twice as much money per year as Blue City does for its public schoolseven though both cities have about the same number of residents. It seems clear, therefore, that Parson City residents care more about public school education than do Blue City residents.
提綱：
The citys budget for its public schools is not an accurate indication of the value it places on public education.
The author fails to inform us what fraction of the total budget are used for public schools in each city, thus we cannot evaluate which city cares more about public school education.
Many other differences between Parson City and Blue City may also contribute to the differences in the amount of money they budget for their public schools.
We do not know the amount of students who go to public schools in the two cities, thus we could not evaluate the argument.
The amount of city budgets for public schools may not represent residents attitude towards public school education.
注：題目中括號里的數字表明這句話體現的是提綱中第幾號缺陷。
無論是gre issue還是gre argument，考生都應該養成寫提綱的習慣。這種提綱式的gre寫作練習可以幫助考生鍛煉寫作的邏輯性，而gre寫作高分最重要的得分依據就是作文的邏輯性要強。
